بحثالمحتوياتتسجيل دخولفي الموقع حالياهناك حاليا 17 أعضاء و 17 ضيوف في الموقع.
|
مراسلون بلاد حدود "قلقة"من إرتفاع عدد مواقع الإنترنت المحجوبة في سورية أرسل من قبل DAM في الخميس, 2007/12/27 - 1:18am.
أعربت منظمة مراسلون بلا حدود التي تعنى بالحريات الصحافية في العالم عن "قلقها الشديد من إنتهاك الحريات المعلوماتية والصحافية في سورية وحجب الكثير من مواقع الإنترنت وصل عددها بحسب المنظمة إلى أكثر من 110 موقع شهير عالمي". في وقت عزا مصدر ذو صلة بالشأن المعلوماتي السبب إلى "غياب قانون للنشر الإلكتروني أوللضوابط المتعلقة بموضوعات هامة تتعلق بالنسيج الاجتماعي في سورية ". ووضعت منظمة "مراسلون بلا حدود" الدولية في تقريرها عن الحريات الصحفية في العالم عن عام 2006 سورية في المرتبة 153 بين 168 دولة من حيث حرية الصحافة لكن تقريرا صادرا عن "الاتحاد العام للصحفيين العرب" وضع سورية في المرتبة الثالثة من بين الدول العربية في مجال احترام حرية الصحافة والصحفيين. المصدر: syria-news ( سوريا )
 خلي يكون عندنا تصريف متل العالم بالشوارع بعدين منفكر بالـحريات المعلوماتية..
مو ليكون عنا شوارع بالأصل
 أنا عن جد فرطت ضحك وقت شفت موقع Amazon محجوب 
 ما في محجوب عندي  بس ما يحجبولنا موقعنا بالمعية
سيدي يحجبوا مو مشكلة, بس مايحجبونا نحنا كمان  
 "حيث تقوم كل جهة مسؤولة تعتبر نفسها معنية بموضوع من الموضوعات بالطلب الى مؤسسة الإتصالات إغلاق منفذ هذا الموقع أو ذاك" Two years ago I criticized a certain ISP in Syria for allowing users to suggest banning websites which they view as inappropriate. Almost everyone except very few misunderstood my point and claimed that I support the spread of pornography.
My whole point was that if ignorants vote, the elected system will not be short of disappointments. The ignorants suggested blocking Youtube, Facebook, and Amazon, while I don't really see any limitation on pornography (not that I'd want to). I wouldn't think SCS could have thought about blocking such websites if it wasn't for those weekend patriots, who are still thinking that they are protecting their society. Was I right here afterall? Two years ago I criticized a certain ISP in Syria for allowing users to suggest banning websites which they view as inappropriate. Almost everyone except very few misunderstood my point and claimed that I support the spread of pornography.
My whole point was that if ignorants vote, the elected system will not be short of disappointments. The ignorants suggested blocking Youtube, Facebook, and Amazon, while I don't really see any limitation on pornography (not that I'd want to). I wouldn't think SCS could have thought about blocking such websites if it wasn't for those weekend patriots, who are still thinking that they are protecting their society. Was I right here afterall? Secondly blocking a site for violating the law isn't a bad thing (they do this all over the world). in our case there is no obvious law regarding this matter which is bad but the worse (and I think it's coming) is having a wrong law. Finally No you wasn't right The blocking suggestion system is not like what you are describing, it has been said before and I'll remind you, suggestions will be viewed by staff and if the site really violates the filter (which is now optional BTW) rules then it will be blocked, But I think since there was no law the ISP should had made the filter optional from the beginning. personally I would support a law to block pornographic sites, but I don't think we should block anti-Islamic sites, what could we benefit from that? wouldn't be like hiding our heads in the sand?! Anyway the issue here is that they're not just blocking sites for what ever reason they like but they're also doing it stupidly, blocking entire sites like blogspot, facebook and youtube only because they would like to block a few posts in them! ما في محجوب عندي
هيئتك عم تفوت عن طريق بروكسي تاني وبتوقع أنو بروكسي Socks .. صح ؟
 الشي الوحيد يلي محجوب عندي هو الـ CSS تبع المواقع التي يفترض أنها محجوبة  .Facebook.jpg  I remember the discussion you're talking about (wow, was that two years ago already?), and Ayman's response at the end was illuminating for me. Sites that violate the laws of the state are blocked. However, stupidity is our worst enemy. In these days of super huge sites like blogspot, utube, and such, if only one of them is blocked then the internet experience of most people is very much damaged. Imagine if they block google or wikipedia or gmail...
Imagine if they block google or wikipedia or gmail...
Every Thing Could Happen Why not ...
Espicially if they said google earth is forbidden 4 violatin the law and also there manufature Google
هيئتك عم تفوت عن طريق بروكسي تاني وبتوقع أنو بروكسي Socks .. صح ؟
لأ. If they block Google, concerned Syrian youth should engage in mass suicide right infront of the SCS headquarters, a la Kaiowas.
If they block Google, concerned Syrian youth should engage in mass suicide right infront of the SCS headquarters, a la Kaiowas.
Why not mass emigration?... Oh wait that's already happening.
If they block Google, concerned Syrian youth should engage in mass suicide right infront of the SCS headquarters, a la Kaiowas.
Why not mass emigration?... Oh wait that's already happening.
Suicide is for those who are unable to emigrate
|
© 2004-2008 CSC-SY
خلي يكون عندنا تصريف متل العالم بالشوارع بعدين منفكر بالـحريات المعلوماتية..